Religious and Republican at the Shrine of Democracy /bigger>/bigger>/bigger>/bigger>/color>/fontfamily>
/bigger>/bigger>/fontfamily>By Dr
Gerry Lower
/color>/fontfamily>
/bigger>/bigger>/fontfamily>Have you ever
noticed how many brand name American commodities (beer would be a good example)
have been watered down beyond uniqueness, made entirely bland in order to
accommodate a mass market? Back in the days before individual creativity and
opportunity died (or was stolen away),
The same is true of the American Press. The news and commentary we are provided
by the large media outlets are necessarily watered down beyond uniqueness, made
entirely bland in order to accomdate a mass market -"careful how you say
that, make it so they can all swallow it." Consequently, one can
oftentimes benefit by going into the smaller city scene to find out what is
really beneath the national fluff. So let me take you for a brief sojourn into
western
"West River" (i.e., west of the Missouri), as the region is known, is
culturally-dominated by Old Testament religion and conservative Republican
capitalism, accompanied by western hospitality and a wild and woolly western
"clickiness," a.k.a. cronyism. As a direct result, of course,
Conservative Republican dominion works for regional growth and development,
although the area does suffer from business people who are far too competitive
for their own good, a situation which breeds the typical desperation beneath
most corruption. This much-pursued growth threatens daily some of the most spectacular
landscapes in North America, the Black Hills National Forest and several
national parks and monuments, including Mount Rushmore, the Shrine of
Democracy.
Well-healed folks from larger Midwestern cities are moving to
The "balanced" but decidedly Republican Rapid City Journal
prints editorials daily which amount to nothing more than loudly self-righteous
tirades against liberalism and all political approaches smelling of the
Democratic party.
Why, just a couple of weeks ago Shirley wrote about antiwar demonstrators in
Certainly, the editors at the Journal can differentiate between
thoughtful commentary and an egregiously self-righteous outburst. The fact that
the editors do not much bother making such distinctions in prioritizing
editorial commentary says quite a lot about the deeply self-righteous religious
attitudes embedded in West River culture (as a microcosm of the national scene
with less confusing fluff) and about the sorry state of the press in America,
which was originally designed to measure the news relative to the values of
democracy, not to the values of post World War II capitalism.
Here in
Here we are, in the shadow of
George Washington: "The preservation of the sacred fire of liberty and the
destiny of the republican model of government are justly considered as deeply,
perhaps as finally staked, on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the
American people."
Thomas Jefferson: "I have sworn upon the alter of God, eternal hostility
against every form of tyranny over the mind of men." Or better yet,
"Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not
constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their
gains." Or, "the purest system of morals ever before preached to man
[nascent Christianity] has been adulterated and sophisticated by artificial
constructions [Old Testament moralities] into a mere contrivance to filch wealth
and power [...] and perverted into an engine for enslaving mankind, so as to
constitute the real Antichrist."
Theodore Roosevelt: "To announce that there must be no criticism of the
president, or that we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only
unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American
public." What more can be said? "We here in
Abraham Lincoln: "As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master.
This expresses my idea of democracy. Whatever differs from this, to the extent
of the difference, is no democracy." Or better yet, "Labor is prior
to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could
never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of
capital, and deserves much the higher consideration."
Doesn't sound very religious or capitalistic, does it? Sounds more like these
men were speaking from the values of democracy, doesn't it?
So, here is what I want to know. What gives with you people living in
Rushmore's shadow? What gives with the Republican Party in
Have you noticed that since Bush's appointment to the Oval Office, your
"ilk" has become infallible, incapable of being stupid and doing
wrong? Have you noticed that you no longer need to make any sense, common or
otherwise, in promoting your agenda? Have you noticed how you
"teflonize" those who tell you what you want to hear so that you do
not have to challenge yourself or your thinking -in a country birthed from much
larger thinking?
Have you noticed how empty arguments flavored with self-righteousness can
oftentimes "win" the day? That smug cultural attitude, of course,
emerges from JudeoRoman religious thinking, no Christian values in sight, as
Jefferson well knew. Therefore, he gave you and me the right to believe in personal
religious infallibility if we wish, in the Catholic tradition. But you and I
have no right to impose that belief, or any other religious belief, upon
another living soul. By Jefferson's standards, don't you see, you have sold out
... completely. That happened the instant you found your way to values other
than those outlined in the Declaration, certainly one of the most Christian
documents ever written.
Have you noticed how you refuse to listen to reason and how you wrap your
efforts in religion and patriotism so that you do not have to bother with
intelligent explanation -because you know that the supernatural notions which
nourish your attitudes do not logically cut it in the real world anymore? Have
you noticed how far out of sync you are with every single granite mind
enshrined on Mount Rushmore? We all appreciate a break from having to think now
and then, but you folks have made it into a way of life. Good for you.
One does wonder, however, why you strive so hard to win, as if nothing else
matters, fabrications, distortions and fantasies being just part of a
well-fought game. Despite swings of the political pendulum, you folks have been
winning all along, don't you see, gradually acquiring more and more control
over "acceptable" American thought and behavior, more and more
control over national positions and postures, more and more control over the
working individual's ability to secure a living income. In a nutshell, it has
been a quest for more and more authority over the people and less and less
responsibility for the people, an approach which can ultimately be only
self-defeating. Your savior warned about service to mammon.
You have created more and more opportunities for the rich and fewer and fewer
opportunities for working people. Your world is one in which bright and
talented people do not start up businesses; rich people start up businesses and
they hire bright and talented people for as little as possible to keep margins
up. The destruction of meritocracy and the creation of the largest gap between
"haves" and "have nots" in human history is your doing. You
have converted "the people" (our collective selves) into mindless,
voiceless and odorless consumers who do not need to know and do not deserve
rights, medical, educational or otherwise. You make America unique among the
western democracies. Good for you.
The questions that come to my mind are these. What have you really won outside
of a desperately-illogical and remarkably unconstitutional control over America
and the people? Now that you have finally taken over and, in less than two
decades, hauled America backwards two centuries to our Tory enslavement, what
are you going to do with us? Inquiring people, people who have read Locke and
Jefferson and Paine and Twain and Lincoln and Thoreau and Whitman, want to
know.
Copyright © 2003 by the News Insider and Gerry Lower